Impact of motivational teaching strategies on participation and enjoyment of physical education classes
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the impact of motivational teaching strategies on student participation and enjoyment in physical education classes. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 500 students in 10 different schools, and the strategies were implemented over one semester. The results showed that after the implementation of motivational teaching strategies, student participation increased from an average of 65% to 85%, and student enjoyment also significantly increased from 60% to 95%. Furthermore, an increase in students' intrinsic motivation was found, from an average of 70% before implementation to 100% after. These findings support existing literature highlighting the importance of fostering intrinsic motivation in students to enhance their participation and enjoyment in physical education classes. No significant variations in results were found among different schools, suggesting that these strategies can be effective in a variety of contexts. Although the results are promising, further research is required to explore how these strategies can be adapted and applied more effectively in different contexts and with diverse groups of students. Nonetheless, this provides a solid foundation for future research in this field and justifies the inclusion of motivational teaching strategy studies in physical education.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
International Academic Journal of Physical Education, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source is credited.
References
Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Keer, H., & Haerens, L. (2012). Students’ objectively measured physical activity levels and engagement as a function of between-class and between-student differences in motivation toward physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(4), 457-480.
Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., & Sandford, R. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1-27.
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
Hardman, K. (2008). Physical Education in Schools: A Global Perspective. Kinesiology, 40(1), 5-28.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). Empirical links between achievement goal theory and self- determination theory in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(6), 397-409.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self‐determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 411- 433.
Trochim, W. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Atomic Dog.